F100.AX vs. CORE.AX
F100.AX (Betashares FTSE 100 ETF) and CORE.AX (Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds. F100.AX is passively managed, while CORE.AX is actively managed. Over the past year, F100.AX returned 11.20% vs 15.14% for CORE.AX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. F100.AX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CORE.AX.
Performance
F100.AX vs. CORE.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, F100.AX achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than CORE.AX's 4.95% return.
F100.AX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 11.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.10%
- 10Y*
- —
CORE.AX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 1Y
- 15.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
F100.AX vs. CORE.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
F100.AX Betashares FTSE 100 ETF | 1.78% | 9.45% |
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 4.95% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between F100.AX and CORE.AX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
F100.AX vs. CORE.AX — Risk / Return Rank
F100.AX
CORE.AX
F100.AX vs. CORE.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares FTSE 100 ETF (F100.AX) and Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| F100.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.68 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | 4.54 | -0.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
F100.AX vs. CORE.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum F100.AX drawdown since its inception was -31.78%, which is greater than CORE.AX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for F100.AX and CORE.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| F100.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.78% | -10.20% | -21.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -10.20% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -1.34% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.91% | -2.60% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | — | — |
Volatility
F100.AX vs. CORE.AX - Volatility Comparison
Betashares FTSE 100 ETF (F100.AX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF (CORE.AX) at 2.12%. This indicates that F100.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CORE.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| F100.AX | CORE.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.12% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 7.39% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.48% | 12.44% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 12.50% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 12.50% | +2.40% |
F100.AX vs. CORE.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison
F100.AX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CORE.AX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
F100.AX vs. CORE.AX - Dividend Comparison
F100.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than CORE.AX's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORE.AX Schroder Global Core Fund - Active ETF | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
F100.AX Betashares FTSE 100 ETF | 2.25% | 3.09% | 1.91% | 1.57% | 1.62% | 2.13% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
F100.AX and CORE.AX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CORE.AX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CORE.AX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for F100.AX.
They also come from different issuers: BetaShares and Schroder. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for F100.AX and 0.25% for CORE.AX.
Find the right allocation for F100.AX and CORE.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer