QNZNX vs. HECA
QNZNX (AQR Trend Total Return Fund) and HECA (Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF) are both funds - QNZNX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR Funds, while HECA is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Hedgeye. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QNZNX charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for HECA.
Performance
QNZNX vs. HECA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QNZNX achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than HECA's 0.22% return.
QNZNX
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 18.15%
- 6M
- 20.39%
- 1Y
- 38.15%
- 3Y*
- 32.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HECA
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QNZNX vs. HECA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QNZNX AQR Trend Total Return Fund | 18.15% | 16.09% |
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 0.22% | 12.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QNZNX and HECA is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QNZNX vs. HECA — Risk / Return Rank
QNZNX
HECA
QNZNX vs. HECA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) and Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF (HECA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QNZNX | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.62 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.72 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.97 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QNZNX | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | 1.15 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
QNZNX vs. HECA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QNZNX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than HECA's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNZNX and HECA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QNZNX | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -11.81% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.09% | +10.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -3.15% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | — | — |
Volatility
QNZNX vs. HECA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QNZNX | HECA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.79% | 12.44% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 12.44% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 12.44% | -0.39% |
QNZNX vs. HECA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QNZNX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than HECA's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
QNZNX vs. HECA - Dividend Comparison
QNZNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than HECA's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HECA Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF | 2.01% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QNZNX AQR Trend Total Return Fund | 0.73% | 0.86% | 16.46% | 23.14% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QNZNX and HECA have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QNZNX and HECA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer