PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNZNX vs. GFIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QNZNX vs. GFIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QNZNX vs. GFIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
6.92%22.88%34.96%22.73%1.37%
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.22%0.54%-5.17%-3.87%10.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNZNX achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly higher than GFIRX's 0.22% return.


QNZNX

1D
0.88%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
6.92%
6M
11.48%
1Y
27.14%
3Y*
28.03%
5Y*
10Y*

GFIRX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
0.22%
6M
3.35%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
-0.29%
5Y*
2.43%
10Y*
2.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QNZNX vs. GFIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNZNX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than GFIRX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QNZNX vs. GFIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNZNX
QNZNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QNZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QNZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GFIRX
GFIRX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GFIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GFIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNZNX vs. GFIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) and Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QNZNXGFIRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

0.88

+1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.55

1.24

+1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.17

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.30

+1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.76

4.01

+9.75

QNZNX vs. GFIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNZNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the GFIRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNZNX and GFIRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QNZNXGFIRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

0.88

+1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.79

0.22

+1.56

Correlation

The correlation between QNZNX and GFIRX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QNZNX vs. GFIRX - Dividend Comparison

QNZNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while GFIRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
0.80%0.86%16.46%23.14%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFIRX
Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%20.11%7.35%1.21%7.06%0.16%0.49%0.00%3.98%

Drawdowns

QNZNX vs. GFIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNZNX drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum GFIRX drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNZNX and GFIRX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QNZNXGFIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-23.09%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-5.15%

-5.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-12.28%

+10.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-7.00%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.85%

+0.22%

Volatility

QNZNX vs. GFIRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) is 2.66%, while Goldman Sachs Managed Futures Strategy Fund (GFIRX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that QNZNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFIRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QNZNXGFIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

3.26%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

6.23%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

8.80%

+4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.20%

10.37%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.20%

9.04%

+3.16%