PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

QNTG.L is traded in GBp, while WEBA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WEBA.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNTG.L achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than WEBA.DE's -0.93% return.


QNTG.L

1D
4.04%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
-6.88%
6M
-7.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WEBA.DE

1D
2.23%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
0.27%
1Y
12.75%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNTG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WEBA.DE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNTG.L

WEBA.DE
WEBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WEBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D (WEBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QNTG.LWEBA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.67

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between QNTG.L and WEBA.DE is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE - Dividend Comparison

QNTG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WEBA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%.


TTM202520242023
QNTG.L
VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WEBA.DE
Amundi US Tech 100 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD D
0.68%0.73%0.63%0.05%

Drawdowns

QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNTG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, roughly equal to the maximum WEBA.DE drawdown of -23.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTG.L and WEBA.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QNTG.LWEBA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.25%

-25.46%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.84%

-6.82%

-13.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-4.52%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

Volatility

QNTG.L vs. WEBA.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QNTG.LWEBA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.42%

17.67%

+9.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.42%

16.12%

+11.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

16.12%

+11.30%