QNTG.L vs. PSI
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI).
QNTG.L and PSI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QNTG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Quantum Leaders Index. It was launched on May 21, 2025. PSI is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. Both QNTG.L and PSI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QNTG.L vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QNTG.L vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | -6.88% | 18.84% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 25.13% | 50.46% |
Different Trading Currencies
QNTG.L is traded in GBp, while PSI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QNTG.L achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 25.13% return.
QNTG.L
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- -6.88%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSI
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 25.13%
- 6M
- 37.74%
- 1Y
- 98.50%
- 3Y*
- 30.17%
- 5Y*
- 19.57%
- 10Y*
- 28.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QNTG.L vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QNTG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QNTG.L vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
QNTG.L
PSI
QNTG.L vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QNTG.L | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between QNTG.L and PSI is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QNTG.L vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
QNTG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.08% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Drawdowns
QNTG.L vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QNTG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTG.L and PSI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QNTG.L | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.25% | -62.96% | +39.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.84% | -7.31% | -12.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -16.05% | +8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility
QNTG.L vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QNTG.L | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.42% | 43.50% | -16.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 35.92% | -8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 34.05% | -6.63% |