QNTG.L vs. PIGI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L).
QNTG.L and PIGI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QNTG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Quantum Leaders Index. It was launched on May 21, 2025. PIGI.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Oct 8, 2020. Both QNTG.L and PIGI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QNTG.L vs. PIGI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QNTG.L vs. PIGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | -6.88% | 18.84% |
PIGI.L HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF | -0.59% | 9.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QNTG.L achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than PIGI.L's -0.59% return.
QNTG.L
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -6.13%
- YTD
- -6.88%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIGI.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QNTG.L vs. PIGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QNTG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PIGI.L's 0.69% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QNTG.L vs. PIGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QNTG.L | PIGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.47 | -1.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between QNTG.L and PIGI.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QNTG.L vs. PIGI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither QNTG.L nor PIGI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
QNTG.L vs. PIGI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QNTG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, which is greater than PIGI.L's maximum drawdown of -6.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTG.L and PIGI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QNTG.L | PIGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.25% | -6.15% | -17.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.84% | -5.07% | -14.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -1.14% | -6.81% |
Volatility
QNTG.L vs. PIGI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QNTG.L | PIGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.42% | 8.81% | +18.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 8.81% | +18.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 8.81% | +18.61% |