QMOM vs. BOXX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) and BOXX (Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while BOXX is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index. QMOM is actively managed, while BOXX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QMOM returned 23.22%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for BOXX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QMOM charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BOXX.

Performance

QMOM vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMOM achieves a 24.65% return, which is significantly higher than BOXX's 1.58% return.

QMOM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 6M: 26.71%
• 1Y: 31.51%
• 3Y*: 23.22%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 13.82%

BOXX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.10%
• 3Y*: 4.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMOM vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	24.65%	2.36%	30.43%	9.50%	1.17%
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF	1.58%	4.37%	5.16%	5.04%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QMOM and BOXX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2022	0.01

QMOM vs. BOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QMOM	BOXX
Industrials	37.5%	8.7%
Technology	23.9%	33.1%
Basic Materials	9.0%	1.9%
Healthcare	8.9%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	10.1%
Energy	5.5%	3.5%
Communication Services	4.2%	10.7%
Utilities	2.0%	2.5%
Financial Services	1.9%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	5.4%
Real Estate	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

QMOM vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 42
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 53

BOXX

BOXX Risk / Return Rank: 100
BOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMOM vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMOM	BOXX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	12.84	-11.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	38.04	-36.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	9.98	-8.73
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	59.77	-57.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.15	531.84	-522.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QMOM vs. BOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the BOXX Sharpe Ratio of 12.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMOM and BOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMOM	BOXX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	12.84	-11.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	12.91	-12.39

Drawdowns

QMOM vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.13%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMOM and BOXX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMOM	BOXX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.13%	-0.12%	-39.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	-0.07%	-12.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.46%	-0.12%	-26.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	0.00%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-0.00%	-12.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	0.01%	+3.44%

Volatility

QMOM vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.32% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.09%. This indicates that QMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMOM	BOXX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.32%	0.09%	+8.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.78%	0.25%	+19.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.30%	0.32%	+22.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.19%	0.37%	+23.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.49%	0.37%	+26.12%

QMOM vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMOM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMOM vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison

QMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.44%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMOM and BOXX in my portfolio?

QMOM and BOXX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMOM or BOXX?

QMOM has higher volatility (8.32%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMOM dropped -39.13% vs BOXX's -0.12%.

Which ETF is better, QMOM or BOXX?

On 3-year performance, QMOM leads with 23.22% vs 4.75% for BOXX. On fees, BOXX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BOXX has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMOM or BOXX?

Over the 3-year period, QMOM has performed better with a 23.22% return vs 4.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMOM or BOXX?

BOXX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QMOM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMOM or BOXX?

QMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.

What is the main difference between QMOM and BOXX?

QMOM is categorized as Momentum, while BOXX is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QMOM and 0.19% for BOXX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.84 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.