QMNV vs. JANB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QMNV (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QMNV charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.

Performance

QMNV vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November (QMNV) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMNV achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly higher than JANB's 6.08% return.

QMNV

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.45%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 7.34%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JANB

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 7.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMNV vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QMNV FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November	7.25%	4.77%
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF	6.08%	2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between QMNV and JANB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

QMNV vs. JANB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMNV

QMNV Risk / Return Rank: 86
QMNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
QMNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
QMNV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
QMNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QMNV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMNV vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - November (QMNV) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMNV	JANB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.04	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.43	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.89	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMNV	JANB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.46	1.97	-0.50

Drawdowns

QMNV vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMNV drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, which is greater than JANB's maximum drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNV and JANB.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMNV	JANB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-6.52%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.22%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-1.14%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QMNV	JANB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.81%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.67%	7.41%	-0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.09%	7.41%	+3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.09%	7.41%	+3.68%

QMNV vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMNV has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMNV vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither QMNV nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMNV and JANB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, QMNV and JANB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QMNV or JANB?

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMNV or JANB?

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMNV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMNV or JANB?

QMNV and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QMNV and JANB?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QMNV and 0.25% for JANB.