PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMNIX vs. PIPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMNIX achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly lower than PIPAX's 9.45% return. Over the past 10 years, QMNIX has underperformed PIPAX with an annualized return of 6.27%, while PIPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.


QMNIX

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.12%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-3.04%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
6.27%

PIPAX

1D
0.66%
1M
4.57%
YTD
9.45%
6M
4.81%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
11.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QMNIX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I
-5.92%26.54%25.85%16.61%27.26%17.64%-19.62%-11.30%-11.73%5.85%
PIPAX
PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A
9.45%16.57%14.37%21.29%-9.30%18.02%3.78%25.94%-10.40%18.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QMNIX and PIPAX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMNIX vs. PIPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMNIX
QMNIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QMNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PIPAX
PIPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PIPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PIPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMNIXPIPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.27

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

1.73

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

6.00

-4.97

QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMNIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the PIPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMNIX and PIPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMNIXPIPAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.26

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.85

0.77

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.80

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.53

+0.33

Drawdowns

QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMNIX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum PIPAX drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNIX and PIPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMNIXPIPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-57.80%

+19.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-10.72%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.30%

-15.24%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.86%

-19.17%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-35.55%

-3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

0.00%

-6.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-7.36%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.08%

+0.46%

Volatility

QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) is 2.78%, while PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that QMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMNIXPIPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.68%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.23%

13.05%

-7.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.72%

14.72%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.36%

14.27%

-4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

14.66%

-6.37%

QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMNIX has a 5.48% expense ratio, which is higher than PIPAX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Dividend Comparison

QMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than PIPAX's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIPAX
PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A
5.13%5.61%12.69%10.56%10.66%7.59%1.44%11.71%8.25%7.38%0.78%8.16%
QMNIX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I
1.50%1.41%6.10%21.48%5.95%1.39%17.42%3.83%0.48%3.48%1.51%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMNIX and PIPAX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIPAX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to QMNIX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNIX dropped -38.80% vs PIPAX's -57.80%.

PIPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMNIX and PIPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer