QMNIX vs. PIPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX).
QMNIX is an actively managed fund by AQR Funds. It was launched on Oct 7, 2014. PIPAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Oct 31, 2003.
Performance
QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMNIX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I | -3.36% | 26.54% | 25.85% | 16.61% | 27.26% | 17.64% | -19.62% | -11.30% | -11.73% | 5.85% |
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | -0.96% | 16.57% | 14.37% | 21.29% | -9.30% | 18.02% | 3.78% | 25.94% | -10.40% | 18.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMNIX achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than PIPAX's -0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, QMNIX has underperformed PIPAX with an annualized return of 6.35%, while PIPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.00% annualized return.
QMNIX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -3.36%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 11.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 18.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.35%
PIPAX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -9.41%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.66%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMNIX has a 5.48% expense ratio, which is higher than PIPAX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QMNIX vs. PIPAX — Risk / Return Rank
QMNIX
PIPAX
QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMNIX | PIPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.86 | 0.55 | +1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 0.76 | +1.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.13 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 0.56 | +1.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.42 | 2.18 | +3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMNIX | PIPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 0.55 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.97 | 0.70 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.76 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.51 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between QMNIX and PIPAX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Dividend Comparison
QMNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than PIPAX's 5.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMNIX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I | 1.46% | 1.41% | 6.10% | 21.48% | 5.95% | 1.39% | 17.42% | 3.83% | 0.48% | 3.48% | 1.51% | 2.57% |
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 5.66% | 5.61% | 12.69% | 10.56% | 10.66% | 7.59% | 1.44% | 11.71% | 8.25% | 7.38% | 0.78% | 8.16% |
Drawdowns
QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMNIX drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum PIPAX drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNIX and PIPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMNIX | PIPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.80% | -57.80% | +19.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.43% | -12.80% | +7.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.05% | -19.17% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.80% | -35.55% | -3.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -9.41% | +5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.39% | -7.39% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 3.63% | -1.49% |
Volatility
QMNIX vs. PIPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) is 1.35%, while PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that QMNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QMNIX | PIPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 6.56% | -5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.16% | 11.72% | -7.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.32% | 16.65% | -10.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.50% | 14.00% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.22% | 14.60% | -6.38% |