PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMLFX vs. UPAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QMLFX

1D
1.05%
1M
9.25%
YTD
18.90%
6M
16.97%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
10.51%

UPAAX

1D
1.73%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QMLFX and UPAAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMLFX vs. UPAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMLFX
QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

UPAAX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMLFXUPAAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.54

QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMLFXUPAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

34.28

-33.86

Drawdowns

QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMLFX drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, which is greater than UPAAX's maximum drawdown of -0.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMLFX and UPAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMLFXUPAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.59%

-0.25%

-36.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

-0.12%

-12.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

Volatility

QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMLFXUPAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.52%

22.25%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

22.25%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

22.25%

-1.28%

QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMLFX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UPAAX's 2.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Dividend Comparison

QMLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while UPAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QMLFX
Quantified Market Leaders Fund
1.15%1.37%0.00%1.99%0.00%26.84%9.58%0.00%15.63%12.15%2.22%1.63%
UPAAX
Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QMLFX and UPAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMLFX and UPAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer