QMLFX vs. UPAAX
QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) and UPAAX (Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QMLFX charges 1.30%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for UPAAX.
Performance
QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QMLFX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 18.90%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
UPAAX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund | 1.20% |
UPAAX Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMLFX and UPAAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMLFX vs. UPAAX — Risk / Return Rank
QMLFX
UPAAX
QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund (UPAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMLFX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.94 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMLFX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 34.28 | -33.86 |
Drawdowns
QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMLFX drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, which is greater than UPAAX's maximum drawdown of -0.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMLFX and UPAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMLFX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.59% | -0.25% | -36.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -0.12% | -12.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility
QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMLFX | UPAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 22.25% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 22.25% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 22.25% | -1.28% |
QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMLFX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UPAAX's 2.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMLFX vs. UPAAX - Dividend Comparison
QMLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, while UPAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund | 1.15% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 26.84% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 15.63% | 12.15% | 2.22% | 1.63% |
UPAAX Upright Assets Allocation Plus Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, QMLFX and UPAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for QMLFX and UPAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer