QMLFX vs. QFITX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) and QFITX (Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund) are both mutual funds - QMLFX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Advisors Preferred, while QFITX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Advisors Preferred. Over the past 5 years, QMLFX returned 0.57%/yr vs -1.40%/yr for QFITX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QMLFX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.56%/yr for QFITX.

Performance

QMLFX vs. QFITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMLFX achieves a 18.90% return, which is significantly higher than QFITX's -4.10% return.

QMLFX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 9.25%
• YTD: 18.90%
• 6M: 16.97%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

QFITX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: -4.10%
• 6M: -5.33%
• 1Y: -5.47%
• 3Y*: -5.96%
• 5Y*: -1.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMLFX vs. QFITX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	18.90%	0.97%	11.05%	15.04%	-23.59%	13.22%	37.81%	12.61%
QFITX Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund	-4.10%	-7.64%	-1.03%	-6.54%	-22.87%	36.77%	10.36%	2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between QMLFX and QFITX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2019	0.07

Over the past year, QMLFX and QFITX have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

QMLFX vs. QFITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMLFX

QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 52
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

QFITX

QFITX Risk / Return Rank: 1
QFITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
QFITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
QFITX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
QFITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QFITX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMLFX vs. QFITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) and Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMLFX	QFITX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	-1.00	+2.94
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	-1.33	+3.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.83	+0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.91	-0.63	+4.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.54	-1.42	+12.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QMLFX vs. QFITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMLFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the QFITX Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMLFX and QFITX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMLFX	QFITX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	-1.00	+2.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.03	-0.07	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	-0.02	+0.44

Drawdowns

QMLFX vs. QFITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMLFX drawdown since its inception was -36.59%, roughly equal to the maximum QFITX drawdown of -38.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMLFX and QFITX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMLFX	QFITX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.59%	-38.03%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.07%	-8.67%	-1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.21%	-20.64%	-6.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.59%	-38.03%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-37.36%	+37.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.54%	-19.27%	+6.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	3.87%	-0.46%

Volatility

QMLFX vs. QFITX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund (QFITX) at 1.60%. This indicates that QMLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QFITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMLFX	QFITX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.62%	1.60%	+6.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.34%	4.16%	+10.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.52%	5.48%	+15.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.23%	21.20%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.97%	20.27%	+0.70%

QMLFX vs. QFITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMLFX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QFITX's 1.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMLFX vs. QFITX - Dividend Comparison

QMLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than QFITX's 13.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QFITX Quantified Tactical Fixed Income Fund	13.26%	12.72%	3.70%	0.08%	0.15%	29.15%	2.12%	4.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	1.15%	1.37%	0.00%	1.99%	0.00%	26.84%	9.58%	0.00%	15.63%	12.15%	2.22%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMLFX and QFITX in my portfolio?

QMLFX and QFITX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMLFX or QFITX?

QMLFX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to QFITX (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMLFX dropped -36.59% vs QFITX's -38.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.