PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMID vs. QARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMID vs. QARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than QARP's 13.09% return.


QMID

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.96%
6M
4.68%
YTD
5.39%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.76%

QARP

1D
0.52%
1M
1.69%
6M
8.81%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$110.48K$118.49K$177.11K
$4.39K$13.06K$31.63K

QMID vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QMID and QARP is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.80

The correlation between QMID and QARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

QMID vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QMID
QARP

Industrials

19.9%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

19.3%
9.4%

Healthcare

17.9%
14.0%

Technology

17.2%
24.1%

Financial Services

13.2%
12.4%

Communication Services

4.6%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
9.5%

Energy

3.0%
6.3%

Basic Materials

0.6%
2.5%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Industrials

QMID
19.9%
QARP
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QMID
19.3%
QARP
9.4%

Healthcare

QMID
17.9%
QARP
14.0%

Technology

QMID
17.2%
QARP
24.1%

Financial Services

QMID
13.2%
QARP
12.4%

Communication Services

QMID
4.6%
QARP
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

QMID
4.4%
QARP
9.5%

Energy

QMID
3.0%
QARP
6.3%

Basic Materials

QMID
0.6%
QARP
2.5%

Real Estate

QMID

-

QARP
1.0%

Utilities

QMID

-

QARP
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMID vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QMID
QMID Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QARP
QARP Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QARP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QMID vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QMIDQARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.41

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

3.37

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.77

15.08

-12.31

QMID vs. QARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the QARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and QARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QMID vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum QARP drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and QARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMIDQARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.42%

-35.44%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-7.26%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-0.14%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-4.37%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

1.62%

+1.53%

Volatility

QMID vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.59%. This indicates that QMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMIDQARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

2.59%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

8.16%

+2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

10.71%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

15.52%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

19.51%

-1.28%

QMID vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMID vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QARP
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
1.02%1.14%1.39%1.28%1.68%1.34%1.61%1.85%1.39%
QMID
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund
0.49%0.51%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMID and QARP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMID has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to QARP (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs QARP's -35.44%.

On 1-year performance, QARP leads with 25.79% vs 10.41% for QMID. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QARP has performed better with a 25.79% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QMID.

QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.49% for QMID.

QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.19% for QARP.

QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMID and QARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer