QMID vs. JQUA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QMID tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index while JQUA tracks the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QMID returned 10.41% vs 22.21% for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QMID charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.

Performance

QMID vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.93% return.

QMID

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 5.39%
• 1Y: 10.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.76%

JQUA

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 13.64%
• YTD: 14.93%
• 1Y: 22.21%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	$26.79M	$28.22M	$36.46M
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	$4.39K	$13.06K	$31.63K

QMID vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	5.39%	5.02%	9.01%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	14.93%	11.69%	17.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and JQUA is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.85

The correlation between QMID and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

QMID vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QMID	JQUA
Industrials	19.9%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	19.3%	9.5%
Healthcare	17.9%	8.8%
Technology	17.2%	41.0%
Financial Services	13.2%	12.0%
Communication Services	4.6%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	5.2%
Energy	3.0%	3.3%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.7%
Real Estate	-	2.2%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

QMID vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 26
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 23
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 31

JQUA

JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 79
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QMID vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMID	JQUA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	1.75	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	2.48	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.30	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	2.95	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.77	12.05	-9.28

QMID vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMID vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and JQUA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMID	JQUA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-32.92%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-7.13%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.36%	-0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.22%	-4.10%	-1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	1.74%	+1.41%

Volatility

QMID vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 2.34%. This indicates that QMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMID	JQUA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	2.34%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	9.47%	+1.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.17%	12.04%	+3.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	15.72%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	17.93%	+0.30%

QMID vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMID vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than JQUA's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	1.08%	1.19%	1.24%	1.21%	1.60%	1.32%	1.44%	1.67%	2.10%	0.40%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.49%	0.51%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMID and JQUA in my portfolio?

QMID and JQUA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMID or JQUA?

QMID has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to JQUA (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

Which ETF is better, QMID or JQUA?

On 1-year performance, JQUA leads with 22.21% vs 10.41% for QMID. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMID or JQUA?

Over the 1-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 22.21% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMID or JQUA?

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMID or JQUA?

JQUA has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.49% for QMID.

What is the main difference between QMID and JQUA?

QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.12% for JQUA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.