QMID vs. DXJ
QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) and DXJ (WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while DXJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QMID returned 13.12% vs 52.60% for DXJ. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QMID charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJ.
Performance
QMID vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 2.79% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 18.76% return.
QMID
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 2.79%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DXJ
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- YTD
- 18.76%
- 6M
- 23.03%
- 1Y
- 52.60%
- 3Y*
- 32.82%
- 5Y*
- 26.08%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
QMID vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund | 2.79% | 5.02% | 9.33% |
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 18.76% | 32.78% | 19.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMID and DXJ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between QMID and DXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
QMID vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QMID
DXJ
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
QMID
DXJ
Consumer Cyclical
QMID
DXJ
Technology
QMID
DXJ
Healthcare
QMID
DXJ
Financial Services
QMID
DXJ
Consumer Defensive
QMID
DXJ
Energy
QMID
DXJ
Communication Services
QMID
DXJ
Basic Materials
QMID
DXJ
Real Estate
QMID
-
DXJ
-
Utilities
QMID
-
DXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMID vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank
QMID
DXJ
QMID vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMID | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 3.03 | -2.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 4.12 | -2.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.55 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 4.83 | -3.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 18.88 | -14.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMID | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 3.03 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.42 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
QMID vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum DXJ drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and DXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMID | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -49.63% | +25.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -10.98% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -0.36% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -14.34% | +8.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.81% | +0.31% |
Volatility
QMID vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 3.59%. This indicates that QMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMID | DXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 3.59% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 13.11% | -2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.97% | 17.43% | -2.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 18.96% | -0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 20.18% | -1.65% |
QMID vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMID vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison
QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than DXJ's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJ WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund | 1.09% | 1.29% | 3.48% | 3.44% | 3.02% | 2.64% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 1.98% | 5.95% |
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund | 0.50% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMID and DXJ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QMID has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to DXJ (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs DXJ's -49.63%.
On 1-year performance, DXJ leads with 52.60% vs 13.12% for QMID. On fees, QMID is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 52.60% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QMID is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.09%, compared with 0.50% for QMID.
QMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.48% for DXJ.
DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QMID and DXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer