QMID vs. DHS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QMID is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QMID returned 9.00% vs 22.41% for DHS. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.38% expense ratio.

Performance

QMID vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than DHS's 12.61% return.

QMID

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.24%
• 6M: -1.04%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DHS

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 11.73%
• 10Y*: 9.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMID vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	1.24%	5.02%	9.01%
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund	12.61%	12.87%	20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and DHS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.58

The correlation between QMID and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QMID vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QMID	DHS
Industrials	25.0%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	15.9%	5.6%
Technology	15.8%	4.1%
Healthcare	14.1%	14.9%
Financial Services	12.0%	22.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.5%	18.5%
Energy	3.2%	8.8%
Communication Services	3.2%	9.0%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.2%
Real Estate	-	2.9%
Utilities	-	8.7%

Return for Risk

QMID vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 24

DHS

DHS Risk / Return Rank: 72
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMID vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMID	DHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	2.21	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	3.27	-2.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.38	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	3.57	-2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.85	12.96	-10.10

QMID vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMID vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and DHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMID	DHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-67.25%	+42.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-6.30%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	-1.19%	-1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-9.53%	+4.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	1.73%	+1.43%

Volatility

QMID vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 3.61%. This indicates that QMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMID	DHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	3.61%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	7.53%	+3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.14%	10.20%	+4.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.43%	13.88%	+4.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.43%	16.08%	+2.35%

QMID vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QMID and DHS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.

Dividends

QMID vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than DHS's 3.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund	3.27%	3.32%	3.66%	4.31%	3.42%	3.29%	4.14%	3.69%	3.76%	3.00%	3.25%	3.53%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.51%	0.51%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMID and DHS in my portfolio?

QMID and DHS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMID or DHS?

QMID has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to DHS (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs DHS's -67.25%.

Which ETF is better, QMID or DHS?

On 1-year performance, DHS leads with 22.41% vs 9.00% for QMID. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMID or DHS?

Over the 1-year period, DHS has performed better with a 22.41% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMID or DHS?

QMID and DHS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMID or DHS?

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.51% for QMID.

What is the main difference between QMID and DHS?

QMID is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.