QMHIX vs. LDLVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QMHIX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund) and LDLVX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - QMHIX is a Systematic Trend fund managed by AQR Funds, while LDLVX is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, QMHIX returned 5.27%/yr vs 2.45%/yr for LDLVX. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. QMHIX charges 1.65%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for LDLVX.

Performance

QMHIX vs. LDLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMHIX achieves a 14.01% return, which is significantly higher than LDLVX's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, QMHIX has outperformed LDLVX with an annualized return of 5.27%, while LDLVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.

QMHIX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 14.01%
• 6M: 14.92%
• 1Y: 32.82%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 17.40%
• 10Y*: 5.27%

LDLVX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 1.25%
• 1Y: 4.53%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 2.46%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHIX vs. LDLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund	14.01%	19.97%	10.78%	-0.17%	50.14%	-2.08%	-0.73%	1.82%	-14.44%	-1.72%
LDLVX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6	0.82%	6.28%	4.94%	5.75%	-5.31%	1.21%	3.22%	5.71%	1.54%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QMHIX and LDLVX is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2015	-0.17

The correlation between QMHIX and LDLVX shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (5 years) to -0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QMHIX vs. LDLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHIX

QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LDLVX

LDLVX Risk / Return Rank: 77
LDLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LDLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
LDLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
LDLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
LDLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHIX vs. LDLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMHIX	LDLVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	1.89	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	3.39	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.66	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.69	3.54	+3.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.54	14.51	+5.04

QMHIX vs. LDLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the LDLVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMHIX and LDLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMHIX vs. LDLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHIX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than LDLVX's maximum drawdown of -9.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHIX and LDLVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMHIX	LDLVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.37%	-9.67%	-29.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.83%	-1.29%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.06%	-1.29%	-17.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.06%	-7.35%	-11.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.54%	-9.67%	-24.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.26%	-0.26%	-4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-1.44%	-16.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	0.31%	+1.34%

Volatility

QMHIX vs. LDLVX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6 (LDLVX) at 0.78%. This indicates that QMHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMHIX	LDLVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	0.78%	+3.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.88%	1.63%	+8.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	2.40%	+10.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.31%	2.80%	+14.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.52%	2.63%	+12.89%

QMHIX vs. LDLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LDLVX's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMHIX vs. LDLVX - Dividend Comparison

QMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than LDLVX's 5.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LDLVX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund Class R6	5.25%	5.29%	4.81%	4.76%	2.64%	2.66%	3.11%	3.86%	4.18%	2.99%	0.00%	0.00%
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund	1.80%	2.05%	2.31%	7.66%	9.34%	10.96%	9.52%	4.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMHIX and LDLVX in my portfolio?

QMHIX and LDLVX have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMHIX or LDLVX?

QMHIX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to LDLVX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMHIX dropped -39.37% vs LDLVX's -9.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.