QMHIX vs. FFUT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT).

QMHIX is managed by AQR Funds. It was launched on Jul 15, 2013. FFUT is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2025.

Performance

QMHIX vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QMHIX vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund	14.62%	13.99%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	7.42%	8.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMHIX achieves a 14.62% return, which is significantly higher than FFUT's 7.42% return.

QMHIX

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 14.62%
• 6M: 19.29%
• 1Y: 27.61%
• 3Y*: 18.04%
• 5Y*: 16.43%
• 10Y*: 5.02%

FFUT

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 2.31%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 6M: 11.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHIX vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.

QMHIX

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund

FFUT

Fidelity Managed Futures ETF

Return for Risk

QMHIX vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHIX

QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 90
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHIX vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMHIX	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.79	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMHIX	FFUT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	1.86	-1.48

Correlation

The correlation between QMHIX and FFUT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QMHIX vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

QMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than FFUT's 1.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMHIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund	1.79%	2.05%	2.31%	7.66%	9.34%	10.96%	9.52%	4.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.57%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.95%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QMHIX vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHIX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -2.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHIX and FFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMHIX	FFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.37%	-2.84%	-36.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-1.59%	+0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.05%	-0.89%	-17.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QMHIX	FFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.98%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.16%	11.01%	+3.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.26%	11.01%	+6.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.50%	11.01%	+4.49%