PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMFRX vs. QLFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMFRX vs. QLFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6 (QMFRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMFRX achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than QLFRX's 0.25% return.


QMFRX

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.39%
YTD
11.42%
6M
13.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLFRX

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.51%
YTD
0.25%
6M
3.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMFRX vs. QLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QMFRX
AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6
11.42%3.55%
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.25%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between QMFRX and QLFRX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMFRX vs. QLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6 (QMFRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QMFRX vs. QLFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMFRXQLFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.14

0.85

+1.28

Drawdowns

QMFRX vs. QLFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMFRX drawdown since its inception was -10.27%, smaller than the maximum QLFRX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMFRX and QLFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMFRXQLFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-14.53%

+4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.99%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-5.64%

+3.39%

Volatility

QMFRX vs. QLFRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMFRXQLFRXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

15.84%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.26%

15.84%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.26%

15.84%

-1.58%

QMFRX vs. QLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMFRX has a 3.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFRX's 6.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMFRX vs. QLFRX - Dividend Comparison

QMFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, more than QLFRX's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.22%0.22%
QMFRX
AQR MS Fusion Fund Class R6
0.43%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMFRX and QLFRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMFRX and QLFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer