PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMFE vs. AIRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMFE vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMFE achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.77% return.


QMFE

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.40%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.98%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIRR

1D
0.54%
1M
3.36%
YTD
31.77%
6M
31.32%
1Y
65.82%
3Y*
37.10%
5Y*
25.40%
10Y*
21.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMFE vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QMFE and AIRR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

0.65

The correlation between QMFE and AIRR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMFE vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMFE
QMFE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
AIRR Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AIRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIRR Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AIRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIRR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMFE vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMFEAIRRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.41

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

5.05

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.22

18.68

+5.54

QMFE vs. AIRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMFE and AIRR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMFEAIRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

2.61

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.67

+0.78

Drawdowns

QMFE vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMFE drawdown since its inception was -11.76%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMFE and AIRR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMFEAIRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-42.37%

+30.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

-13.09%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.86%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-7.43%

+6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

3.53%

-2.69%

Volatility

QMFE vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE) is 1.03%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that QMFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMFEAIRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

7.87%

-6.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

19.82%

-14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.90%

25.40%

-18.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.68%

25.29%

-13.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.68%

26.29%

-14.61%

QMFE vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMFE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMFE vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

QMFE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.13%0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%
QMFE
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMFE and AIRR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIRR has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to QMFE (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMFE dropped -11.76% vs AIRR's -42.37%.

On 1-year performance, AIRR leads with 65.82% vs 20.18% for QMFE. On fees, AIRR is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, QMFE has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 65.82% return vs 20.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIRR is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMFE.

AIRR has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for QMFE.

QMFE is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AIRR is Building & Construction. QMFE tracks Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) Price Return, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance (TR). Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QMFE and 0.70% for AIRR.

QMFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMFE and AIRR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer