QMFE vs. PQOC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QMFE (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February) and PQOC (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October) are both Defined Outcome funds. QMFE is passively managed, while PQOC is actively managed. Over the past year, QMFE returned 15.83% vs 15.84% for PQOC. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. QMFE charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQOC.

Performance

QMFE vs. PQOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October (PQOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QMFE having a 8.49% return and PQOC slightly higher at 8.52%.

QMFE

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.14%
• 6M: 7.38%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 1Y: 15.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.22%

PQOC

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 7.77%
• YTD: 8.52%
• 1Y: 15.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PQOC PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October	$56.46K	$97.27K	$119.79K
QMFE FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February	$172.36K	$105.98K	$195.66K

QMFE vs. PQOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QMFE FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February	8.49%	11.47%
PQOC PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October	8.52%	12.04%

Correlation

The correlation between QMFE and PQOC is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025	0.96

The correlation between QMFE and PQOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QMFE vs. PQOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QMFE

QMFE Risk / Return Rank: 86
QMFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
QMFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
QMFE Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QMFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
QMFE Martin Ratio Rank: 92

PQOC

PQOC Risk / Return Rank: 70
PQOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PQOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PQOC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
PQOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
PQOC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QMFE vs. PQOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October (PQOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMFE	PQOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.61	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	2.28	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.30	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	2.22	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.99	9.75	+6.25

QMFE vs. PQOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the PQOC Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMFE and PQOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMFE vs. PQOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMFE drawdown since its inception was -11.85%, smaller than the maximum PQOC drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMFE and PQOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMFE	PQOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.85%	-13.71%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-6.68%	+1.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-0.85%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.09%	-1.53%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.52%	-0.59%

Volatility

QMFE vs. PQOC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February (QMFE) is 2.24%, while PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October (PQOC) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that QMFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMFE	PQOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.24%	2.82%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.23%	7.19%	-0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.42%	9.17%	-1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.34%	12.64%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.34%	12.64%	-1.30%

QMFE vs. PQOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMFE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PQOC's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMFE vs. PQOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither QMFE nor PQOC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMFE and PQOC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, QMFE and PQOC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QMFE or PQOC?

PQOC has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to QMFE (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMFE dropped -11.85% vs PQOC's -13.71%.

Which ETF is better, QMFE or PQOC?

On 1-year performance, PQOC leads with 15.84% vs 15.83% for QMFE. On fees, PQOC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QMFE has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMFE or PQOC?

Over the 1-year period, PQOC has performed better with a 15.84% return vs 15.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMFE or PQOC?

PQOC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMFE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMFE or PQOC?

QMFE and PQOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QMFE and PQOC?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QMFE and 0.50% for PQOC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.