PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMAX.TO achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly higher than TEC.TO's 17.96% return.


QMAX.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
17.44%
YTD
22.06%
6M
19.75%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TEC.TO

1D
-0.70%
1M
12.30%
YTD
17.96%
6M
15.29%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
31.18%
5Y*
20.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
22.06%16.57%37.65%16.15%
TEC.TO
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF
17.96%15.45%45.60%15.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QMAX.TO and TEC.TO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.93

The correlation between QMAX.TO and TEC.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QMAX.TO
TEC.TO

Technology

69.2%
64.4%

Communication Services

18.3%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
11.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.6%

Healthcare

-

0.7%

Industrials

-

1.2%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QMAX.TO
69.2%
TEC.TO
64.4%

Communication Services

QMAX.TO
18.3%
TEC.TO
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

QMAX.TO
12.5%
TEC.TO
11.8%

Basic Materials

QMAX.TO

-

TEC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

QMAX.TO

-

TEC.TO

-

Energy

QMAX.TO

-

TEC.TO

-

Financial Services

QMAX.TO

-

TEC.TO
3.6%

Healthcare

QMAX.TO

-

TEC.TO
0.7%

Industrials

QMAX.TO

-

TEC.TO
1.2%

Real Estate

QMAX.TO

-

TEC.TO
0.5%

Utilities

QMAX.TO

-

TEC.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMAX.TO
QMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TEC.TO
TEC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TEC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMAX.TOTEC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.33

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

6.92

-1.60

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the TEC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMAX.TO and TEC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMAX.TOTEC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

2.42

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

0.97

+0.61

Drawdowns

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum TEC.TO drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAX.TO and TEC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMAX.TOTEC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-35.31%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.86%

-17.52%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-8.04%

+2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.36%

5.89%

+2.47%

Volatility

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF (TEC.TO) at 4.75%. This indicates that QMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMAX.TOTEC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

4.75%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

12.86%

+3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.53%

16.86%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.66%

22.32%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

23.78%

-0.12%

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TEC.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMAX.TO vs. TEC.TO - Dividend Comparison

QMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, more than TEC.TO's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
9.33%10.79%10.90%2.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TEC.TO
TD Global Technology Leaders Index ETF
0.10%0.13%0.12%0.21%0.31%0.22%0.33%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, QMAX.TO and TEC.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TEC.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TEC.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QMAX.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QMAX.TO and 0.35% for TEC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMAX.TO and TEC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer