QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO
QMAX.TO (Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and SDAY.NEO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMAX.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital, while SDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. Both are actively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SDAY.NEO.
Performance
QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMAX.TO achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly higher than SDAY.NEO's 9.14% return.
QMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 22.06%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 22.06% | 11.54% |
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 9.14% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMAX.TO and SDAY.NEO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
QMAX.TO
SDAY.NEO
QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMAX.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMAX.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 1.39 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than SDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAX.TO and SDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMAX.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -7.75% | -19.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.27% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -1.86% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | — | — |
Volatility
QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMAX.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.53% | 11.55% | +8.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 11.55% | +12.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 11.55% | +12.11% |
QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMAX.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
QMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, less than SDAY.NEO's 16.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 9.33% | 10.79% | 10.90% | 2.01% |
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 16.28% | 8.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMAX.TO and SDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QMAX.TO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QMAX.TO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.
QMAX.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while SDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QMAX.TO and 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.
Find the right allocation for QMAX.TO and SDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer