QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO
QMAX.TO (Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF) and QMVP.TO (Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. QMAX.TO is actively managed, while QMVP.TO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QMAX.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QMVP.TO.
Performance
QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QMAX.TO
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- 22.06%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMVP.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 16.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 27.66% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 27.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMAX.TO and QMVP.TO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QMAX.TO
QMVP.TO
QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QMAX.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QMAX.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.58 | 4.30 | -2.73 |
Drawdowns
QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAX.TO and QMVP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMAX.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -12.77% | -14.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -3.86% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.36% | — | — |
Volatility
QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMAX.TO | QMVP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.53% | 21.70% | -1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 21.70% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 21.70% | +1.96% |
QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
QMAX.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison
QMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, more than QMVP.TO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QMAX.TO Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 9.33% | 10.79% | 10.90% | 2.01% |
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, QMAX.TO and QMVP.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QMVP.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QMVP.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QMAX.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Hamilton. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QMAX.TO and 0.19% for QMVP.TO.
Find the right allocation for QMAX.TO and QMVP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer