PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMAX.TO achieves a 22.06% return, which is significantly higher than HDIV.TO's 16.21% return.


QMAX.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
17.44%
YTD
22.06%
6M
19.75%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDIV.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
6.14%
YTD
16.21%
6M
17.63%
1Y
45.50%
3Y*
27.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
22.06%16.57%37.65%16.15%
HDIV.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF
16.21%33.87%23.15%13.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QMAX.TO and HDIV.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023

0.56

The correlation between QMAX.TO and HDIV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QMAX.TO
HDIV.TO

Technology

69.2%
9.5%

Communication Services

18.3%
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
2.5%

Basic Materials

-

13.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

18.4%

Financial Services

-

39.8%

Healthcare

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

3.0%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Utilities

-

4.7%

Technology

QMAX.TO
69.2%
HDIV.TO
9.5%

Communication Services

QMAX.TO
18.3%
HDIV.TO
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QMAX.TO
12.5%
HDIV.TO
2.5%

Basic Materials

QMAX.TO

-

HDIV.TO
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

QMAX.TO

-

HDIV.TO
0.3%

Energy

QMAX.TO

-

HDIV.TO
18.4%

Financial Services

QMAX.TO

-

HDIV.TO
39.8%

Healthcare

QMAX.TO

-

HDIV.TO
0.2%

Industrials

QMAX.TO

-

HDIV.TO
3.0%

Real Estate

QMAX.TO

-

HDIV.TO
2.1%

Utilities

QMAX.TO

-

HDIV.TO
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMAX.TO
QMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

HDIV.TO
HDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMAX.TOHDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.68

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

5.24

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

25.39

-20.07

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the HDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMAX.TO and HDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMAX.TOHDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

3.67

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

1.26

+0.32

Drawdowns

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, which is greater than HDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMAX.TO and HDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMAX.TOHDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-22.32%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.86%

-8.73%

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.63%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-4.22%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.36%

1.80%

+6.56%

Volatility

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (QMAX.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF (HDIV.TO) at 3.80%. This indicates that QMAX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMAX.TOHDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

3.80%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.34%

10.29%

+6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.53%

12.47%

+8.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.66%

15.63%

+8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.66%

15.63%

+8.03%

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HDIV.TO's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMAX.TO vs. HDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

QMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.33%, which matches HDIV.TO's 9.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HDIV.TO
Hamilton Enhanced Multi-Sector Covered Call ETF
9.33%10.09%11.38%10.41%9.64%3.39%
QMAX.TO
Hamilton Technology YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF
9.33%10.79%10.90%2.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMAX.TO and HDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QMAX.TO.

QMAX.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while HDIV.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for QMAX.TO and 0.00% for HDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMAX.TO and HDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer