PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVE vs. TLTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVE vs. TLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than TLTD's 8.45% return.


QLVE

1D
-1.29%
1M
7.29%
YTD
18.06%
6M
19.74%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*

TLTD

1D
-0.79%
1M
2.60%
YTD
8.45%
6M
11.89%
1Y
26.70%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
9.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLVE vs. TLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
18.06%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%4.16%4.98%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
8.45%39.69%4.78%17.19%-13.74%12.84%4.21%8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVE and TLTD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.74

The correlation between QLVE and TLTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLVE vs. TLTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVE
TLTD

Technology

59.6%
10.3%

Financial Services

38.5%
32.7%

Communication Services

18.4%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
5.6%

Healthcare

7.6%
4.2%

Energy

7.2%
7.7%

Industrials

7.1%
13.5%

Basic Materials

5.5%
7.4%

Utilities

5.4%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.9%

Technology

QLVE
59.6%
TLTD
10.3%

Financial Services

QLVE
38.5%
TLTD
32.7%

Communication Services

QLVE
18.4%
TLTD
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

QLVE
10.8%
TLTD
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVE
10.4%
TLTD
5.6%

Healthcare

QLVE
7.6%
TLTD
4.2%

Energy

QLVE
7.2%
TLTD
7.7%

Industrials

QLVE
7.1%
TLTD
13.5%

Basic Materials

QLVE
5.5%
TLTD
7.4%

Utilities

QLVE
5.4%
TLTD
3.3%

Real Estate

QLVE
0.1%
TLTD
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVE vs. TLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVE vs. TLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVETLTDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

1.86

+0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.99

2.60

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.21

+0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.97

8.49

+3.48

QLVE vs. TLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the TLTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVE and TLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVETLTDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.86

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.60

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.52

-0.04

Drawdowns

QLVE vs. TLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum TLTD drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and TLTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVETLTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-40.62%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-12.11%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-13.10%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-28.96%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-2.35%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-7.68%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.15%

-0.27%

Volatility

QLVE vs. TLTD - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) at 4.34%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVETLTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

4.34%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

11.99%

+2.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

14.46%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

15.97%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

16.81%

-1.02%

QLVE vs. TLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVE vs. TLTD - Dividend Comparison

QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than TLTD's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.42%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.08%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVE and TLTD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to TLTD (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs TLTD's -40.62%.

On 5-year performance, TLTD leads with 9.51% vs 7.43% for QLVE. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TLTD has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.42% for QLVE.

QLVE is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while TLTD is Global Equities. QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.39% for TLTD.

QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVE and TLTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer