QLVE vs. EQLT
QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and EQLT (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QLVE tracks the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index while EQLT tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QLVE returned 23.59% vs 44.38% for EQLT. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QLVE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQLT.
Performance
QLVE vs. EQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than EQLT's 22.86% return.
QLVE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.66%
EQLT
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- 6M
- 14.71%
- YTD
- 22.86%
- 1Y
- 44.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.13%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $77.09K | $55.23K | $122.39K | |
| $2.76K | $7.65K | $20.86K |
QLVE vs. EQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 12.92% | 21.87% | -1.22% |
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF | 22.86% | 33.93% | -1.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVE and EQLT is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between QLVE and EQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLVE vs. EQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVE
EQLT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QLVE
EQLT
Financial Services
QLVE
EQLT
Communication Services
QLVE
EQLT
Energy
QLVE
EQLT
Consumer Defensive
QLVE
EQLT
Consumer Cyclical
QLVE
EQLT
Healthcare
QLVE
EQLT
Industrials
QLVE
EQLT
Utilities
QLVE
EQLT
Basic Materials
QLVE
EQLT
Real Estate
QLVE
EQLT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVE vs. EQLT — Risk / Return Rank
QLVE
EQLT
QLVE vs. EQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVE | EQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 3.61 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 10.91 | -4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVE vs. EQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, which is greater than EQLT's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and EQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVE | EQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -17.38% | -12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -12.00% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -8.36% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -3.81% | -4.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.96% | -0.45% |
Volatility
QLVE vs. EQLT - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) at 5.98%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVE | EQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 5.98% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 21.15% | -4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.46% | 23.39% | -3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 21.25% | -7.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 21.25% | -5.11% |
QLVE vs. EQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EQLT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVE vs. EQLT - Dividend Comparison
QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than EQLT's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF | 2.85% | 3.10% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.68% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVE and EQLT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVE has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to EQLT (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs EQLT's -17.38%.
On 1-year performance, EQLT leads with 44.38% vs 23.59% for QLVE. On fees, EQLT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQLT has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EQLT has performed better with a 44.38% return vs 23.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQLT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.
EQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 2.68% for QLVE.
QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while EQLT tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.35% for EQLT.
EQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVE and EQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer