QLTY vs. GMOIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and GMO International Equity Fund (GMOIX).

QLTY is a passively managed fund by GMO that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Nov 13, 2023. GMOIX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Mar 30, 1987.

Performance

QLTY vs. GMOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and GMO International Equity Fund (GMOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QLTY vs. GMOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QLTY GMO U.S. Quality ETF	-5.77%	21.26%	21.02%	5.68%
GMOIX GMO International Equity Fund	1.83%	43.94%	11.54%	7.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTY achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly lower than GMOIX's 1.83% return.

QLTY

• 1D: 2.76%
• 1M: -6.42%
• YTD: -5.77%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: 16.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMOIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -10.73%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 11.47%
• 1Y: 33.57%
• 3Y*: 22.45%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 10.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLTY vs. GMOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GMOIX's 0.66% expense ratio.

GMOIX

GMO International Equity Fund

QLTY

GMO U.S. Quality ETF

Return for Risk

QLTY vs. GMOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTY

QLTY Risk / Return Rank: 59
QLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 61

GMOIX

GMOIX Risk / Return Rank: 89
GMOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GMOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
GMOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GMOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GMOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTY vs. GMOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and GMO International Equity Fund (GMOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLTY	GMOIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	1.84	-0.89
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	2.44	-0.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.36	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	2.69	-1.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.83	10.53	-4.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLTY vs. GMOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the GMOIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY and GMOIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLTY	GMOIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	1.84	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.33	+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between QLTY and GMOIX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QLTY vs. GMOIX - Dividend Comparison

QLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than GMOIX's 5.52% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLTY GMO U.S. Quality ETF	0.81%	0.73%	0.79%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GMOIX GMO International Equity Fund	5.52%	5.62%	2.77%	7.54%	4.32%	6.40%	4.56%	3.49%	3.74%	3.11%	4.00%	3.26%

Drawdowns

QLTY vs. GMOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTY drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, smaller than the maximum GMOIX drawdown of -59.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY and GMOIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLTY	GMOIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.00%	-59.00%	+42.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-11.67%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.69%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.28%	-11.08%	+1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.09%	-12.97%	+10.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	2.99%	+0.05%

Volatility

QLTY vs. GMOIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) is 5.28%, while GMO International Equity Fund (GMOIX) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that QLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLTY	GMOIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.28%	7.54%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.73%	12.55%	-2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.77%	17.75%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.81%	15.88%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.81%	16.75%	-1.94%