QLTY vs. EBI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QLTY (GMO U.S. Quality ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. QLTY is passively managed, while EBI is actively managed. Over the past year, QLTY returned 23.44% vs 30.46% for EBI. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLTY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.

Performance

QLTY vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTY achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly lower than EBI's 13.70% return.

QLTY

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBI

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 13.70%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 30.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLTY vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLTY GMO U.S. Quality ETF	5.56%	16.73%
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	13.70%	15.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QLTY and EBI is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025	0.86

The correlation between QLTY and EBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QLTY vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTY

QLTY Risk / Return Rank: 53
QLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
QLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 51

EBI

EBI Risk / Return Rank: 84
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTY vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLTY	EBI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.46	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.37	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	4.32	-2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	17.50	-9.35

QLTY vs. EBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the EBI Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY and EBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QLTY vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTY drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, roughly equal to the maximum EBI drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY and EBI.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLTY	EBI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.00%	-17.05%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-7.09%	-4.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.89%	-1.43%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-2.03%	-0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	1.75%	+1.13%

Volatility

QLTY vs. EBI - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLTY	EBI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	4.03%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	9.27%	+0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	12.49%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.68%	17.88%	-3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	17.88%	-3.20%

QLTY vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLTY vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

QLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than EBI's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	0.92%	1.05%	0.00%	0.00%
QLTY GMO U.S. Quality ETF	0.72%	0.73%	0.79%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLTY and EBI in my portfolio?

QLTY and EBI have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLTY or EBI?

QLTY has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to EBI (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLTY dropped -17.00% vs EBI's -17.05%.

Which ETF is better, QLTY or EBI?

On 1-year performance, EBI leads with 30.46% vs 23.44% for QLTY. On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLTY or EBI?

Over the 1-year period, EBI has performed better with a 30.46% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLTY or EBI?

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for QLTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLTY or EBI?

EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.72% for QLTY.

What is the main difference between QLTY and EBI?

They also come from different issuers: GMO and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for QLTY and 0.24% for EBI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.