QLTA vs. JBBB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB).
QLTA and JBBB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLTA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Aaa - A Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 2012. JBBB is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 11, 2022.
Performance
QLTA vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLTA vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLTA iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF | -0.32% | 7.36% | 1.23% | 7.60% | -13.77% |
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | -0.81% | 5.43% | 12.50% | 17.63% | -5.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLTA achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly higher than JBBB's -0.81% return.
QLTA
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.95%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
JBBB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLTA vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLTA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QLTA vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank
QLTA
JBBB
QLTA vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLTA | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.78 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.21 | 1.11 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.18 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.22 | +0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.04 | 5.00 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLTA | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.78 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.22 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLTA and JBBB is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QLTA vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison
QLTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than JBBB's 8.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLTA iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF | 4.38% | 4.33% | 4.11% | 3.39% | 2.79% | 1.96% | 2.31% | 2.99% | 3.09% | 2.67% | 2.59% | 2.99% |
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 8.38% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QLTA vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLTA drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, which is greater than JBBB's maximum drawdown of -10.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTA and JBBB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLTA | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.27% | -10.57% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -3.49% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -2.01% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -1.62% | -3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.85% | +0.10% |
Volatility
QLTA vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF (QLTA) has a higher volatility of 2.20% compared to Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) at 1.96%. This indicates that QLTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLTA | JBBB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.20% | 1.96% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 2.60% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.33% | 5.04% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 5.33% | +1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 5.33% | +1.69% |