QLFRX vs. SNOIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QLFRX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6) and SNOIX (Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund) are both Long-Short funds. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLFRX charges 6.20%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for SNOIX.

Performance

QLFRX vs. SNOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFRX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than SNOIX's 9.17% return.

QLFRX

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNOIX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: 27.49%
• 3Y*: 15.33%
• 5Y*: 8.57%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFRX vs. SNOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6	0.83%	6.80%
SNOIX Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund	9.17%	8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFRX and SNOIX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

QLFRX vs. SNOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SNOIX

SNOIX Risk / Return Rank: 80
SNOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
SNOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SNOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
SNOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SNOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFRX vs. SNOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund (SNOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLFRX	SNOIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.32	+0.62

Drawdowns

QLFRX vs. SNOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFRX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum SNOIX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFRX and SNOIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLFRX	SNOIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.53%	-65.34%	+50.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.33%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.94%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-9.78%	+4.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.35%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLFRX	SNOIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.96%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	11.63%	+4.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.94%	15.05%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.94%	16.52%	-0.58%

QLFRX vs. SNOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFRX has a 6.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SNOIX's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLFRX vs. SNOIX - Dividend Comparison

QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than SNOIX's 6.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6	0.22%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SNOIX Easterly Snow Capital Long/Short Opportunity Fund	6.33%	6.91%	5.10%	2.29%	7.07%	8.98%	1.86%	1.95%	2.06%	4.80%	0.36%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLFRX and SNOIX in my portfolio?

QLFRX and SNOIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.