QLFRX vs. QLFIX
QLFRX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6) and QLFIX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I) are both Long-Short funds from AQR. Both are actively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QLFRX charges 6.20%/yr vs 6.30%/yr for QLFIX.
Performance
QLFRX vs. QLFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLFRX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than QLFIX's 0.75% return.
QLFRX
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFIX
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFRX vs. QLFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.83% | 6.80% |
QLFIX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I | 0.75% | 6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLFRX and QLFIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLFRX vs. QLFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLFRX | QLFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.93 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
QLFRX vs. QLFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLFRX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, roughly equal to the maximum QLFIX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFRX and QLFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLFRX | QLFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -14.53% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.49% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -5.73% | +0.02% |
Volatility
QLFRX vs. QLFIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLFRX | QLFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 15.90% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 15.90% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 15.90% | +0.04% |
QLFRX vs. QLFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLFRX has a 6.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFIX's 6.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLFRX vs. QLFIX - Dividend Comparison
QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than QLFIX's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QLFIX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I | 0.21% | 0.21% |
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.22% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, QLFRX and QLFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for QLFRX and QLFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer