QLFRX vs. ATESX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLFRX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6) and ATESX (Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund) are both Long-Short funds. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLFRX charges 6.20%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for ATESX.

Performance

QLFRX vs. ATESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFRX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than ATESX's 12.48% return.

QLFRX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 6.61%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 6M: 4.10%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ATESX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 8.40%
• YTD: 12.48%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 19.39%
• 3Y*: 9.42%
• 5Y*: 6.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFRX vs. ATESX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6	0.58%	6.80%
ATESX Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund	12.48%	-3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFRX and ATESX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

QLFRX vs. ATESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATESX

ATESX Risk / Return Rank: 36
ATESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
ATESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ATESX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ATESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
ATESX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFRX vs. ATESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLFRX	ATESX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.88	+0.02

Drawdowns

QLFRX vs. ATESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFRX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, which is greater than ATESX's maximum drawdown of -12.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFRX and ATESX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLFRX	ATESX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.53%	-12.87%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.92%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.73%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	0.00%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.67%	-3.69%	-1.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLFRX	ATESX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.89%	10.41%	+5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.89%	10.42%	+5.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.89%	10.97%	+4.92%

QLFRX vs. ATESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFRX has a 6.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ATESX's 2.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLFRX vs. ATESX - Dividend Comparison

QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while ATESX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATESX Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.30%	7.45%	0.00%	0.00%	11.78%	7.70%	6.02%
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6	0.22%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLFRX and ATESX in my portfolio?

QLFRX and ATESX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.