PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFIX vs. QHFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLFIX vs. QHFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 (QHFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFIX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than QHFRX's 3.55% return.


QLFIX

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.60%
YTD
0.25%
6M
3.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QHFRX

1D
-0.16%
1M
8.78%
YTD
3.55%
6M
6.98%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFIX vs. QHFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFIX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I
0.25%6.78%
QHFRX
AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6
3.55%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFIX and QHFRX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLFIX vs. QHFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX) and AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6 (QHFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFIX vs. QHFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFIXQHFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.99

-0.13

Drawdowns

QLFIX vs. QHFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFIX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, which is greater than QHFRX's maximum drawdown of -13.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFIX and QHFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFIXQHFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-13.76%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.41%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-4.95%

-0.71%

Volatility

QLFIX vs. QHFRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLFIXQHFRXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

16.35%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

16.35%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

16.35%

-0.56%

QLFIX vs. QHFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFIX has a 6.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QHFRX's 6.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLFIX vs. QHFRX - Dividend Comparison

QLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, while QHFRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
QHFRX
AQR MS Fusion HV Fund Class R6
0.00%0.00%
QLFIX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I
0.21%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLFIX and QHFRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLFIX and QHFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer