QLDY vs. XMAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and XMAG (Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while XMAG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index. QLDY is actively managed, while XMAG is passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMAG.

Performance

QLDY vs. XMAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than XMAG's 12.73% return.

QLDY

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 11.63%
• YTD: 19.28%
• 6M: 16.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMAG

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 6.69%
• YTD: 12.73%
• 6M: 13.28%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLDY vs. XMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF	19.28%	1.50%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	12.73%	2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between QLDY and XMAG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

QLDY vs. XMAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMAG

XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 68
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLDY vs. XMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLDY	XMAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	1.11	+0.49

Drawdowns

QLDY vs. XMAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than XMAG's maximum drawdown of -16.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and XMAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLDY	XMAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-16.17%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.25%	-2.13%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLDY	XMAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.65%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.57%	11.10%	+8.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.57%	15.12%	+4.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	15.12%	+4.45%

QLDY vs. XMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than XMAG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLDY vs. XMAG - Dividend Comparison

QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.47%, more than XMAG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF	21.47%	9.34%	0.00%
XMAG Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF	0.46%	0.51%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLDY and XMAG in my portfolio?

QLDY and XMAG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QLDY or XMAG?

On fees, XMAG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLDY or XMAG?

XMAG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLDY or XMAG?

QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 21.47%, compared with 0.46% for XMAG.

What is the main difference between QLDY and XMAG?

QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XMAG is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.35% for XMAG.