QLDY vs. TOPW
QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while TOPW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Solactive Roundhill WeeklyPay Universe Index. QLDY is actively managed, while TOPW is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TOPW.
Performance
QLDY vs. TOPW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than TOPW's 2.38% return.
QLDY
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOPW
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLDY vs. TOPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 9.82% | 1.54% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 2.38% | -7.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and TOPW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. TOPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. TOPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum TOPW drawdown of -29.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and TOPW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -29.87% | +12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -14.47% | +6.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -13.31% | +8.96% |
Volatility
QLDY vs. TOPW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | TOPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.84% | 27.51% | -5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 27.51% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 27.51% | -5.67% |
QLDY vs. TOPW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than TOPW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLDY vs. TOPW - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.28%, less than TOPW's 48.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 28.28% | 9.34% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 48.21% | 21.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLDY and TOPW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.
TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 48.21%, compared with 28.28% for QLDY.
QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TOPW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.99% for TOPW.
Find the right allocation for QLDY and TOPW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer