PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLDY vs. TOPW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLDY vs. TOPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than TOPW's 7.71% return.


QLDY

1D
0.03%
1M
11.63%
YTD
19.28%
6M
16.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TOPW

1D
-1.52%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.71%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLDY vs. TOPW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QLDY and TOPW is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025

0.81

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLDY vs. TOPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLDY vs. TOPW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLDYTOPWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

0.25

+1.35

Drawdowns

QLDY vs. TOPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum TOPW drawdown of -29.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and TOPW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDYTOPWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-29.87%

+12.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.02%

+10.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.25%

-12.88%

+8.63%

Volatility

QLDY vs. TOPW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDYTOPWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

27.36%

-7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.57%

27.36%

-7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

27.36%

-7.79%

QLDY vs. TOPW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than TOPW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLDY vs. TOPW - Dividend Comparison

QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.47%, less than TOPW's 40.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QLDY and TOPW have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.

TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 40.33%, compared with 21.47% for QLDY.

QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TOPW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.99% for TOPW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLDY and TOPW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer