QLDY vs. QEW
QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QLDY is actively managed, while QEW is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QEW.
Performance
QLDY vs. QEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QLDY
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 11.63%
- YTD
- 19.28%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QEW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 10.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLDY vs. QEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 27.98% |
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 21.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and QEW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. QEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLDY | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 9.75 | -8.15 |
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. QEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than QEW's maximum drawdown of -4.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and QEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -4.15% | -13.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -0.57% | -3.68% |
Volatility
QLDY vs. QEW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.57% | 15.78% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 15.78% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 15.78% | +3.79% |
QLDY vs. QEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than QEW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLDY vs. QEW - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.47%, while QEW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 21.47% | 9.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLDY and QEW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.
QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 21.47%, compared with 0.00% for QEW.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.25% for QEW.
Find the right allocation for QLDY and QEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer