QLDY vs. IDVO
QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while IDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IDVO.
Performance
QLDY vs. IDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QLDY having a 10.66% return and IDVO slightly higher at 10.75%.
QLDY
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDVO
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLDY vs. IDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 10.66% | 1.54% |
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 10.75% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and IDVO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. IDVO — Risk / Return Rank
QLDY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDVO
QLDY vs. IDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLDY | IDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. IDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than IDVO's maximum drawdown of -15.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and IDVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | IDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -15.46% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.20% | -4.17% | -3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -2.30% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.74% | — |
Volatility
QLDY vs. IDVO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | IDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.38% | 16.40% | +4.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 16.48% | +4.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 16.48% | +4.90% |
QLDY vs. IDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IDVO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLDY vs. IDVO - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.62%, more than IDVO's 5.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 5.65% | 5.42% | 6.14% | 5.72% | 1.96% |
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 24.62% | 9.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLDY and IDVO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.
QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 24.62%, compared with 5.65% for IDVO.
QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.65% for IDVO.
Find the right allocation for QLDY and IDVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer