PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLDY vs. IDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLDY vs. IDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QLDY having a 10.66% return and IDVO slightly higher at 10.75%.


QLDY

1D
-1.66%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
10.66%
6M
8.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IDVO

1D
-0.86%
1M
-1.94%
YTD
10.75%
6M
9.93%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
21.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLDY vs. IDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QLDY and IDVO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLDY vs. IDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLDY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IDVO
IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLDY vs. IDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLDYIDVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

QLDY vs. IDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLDY vs. IDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than IDVO's maximum drawdown of -15.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and IDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDYIDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-15.46%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-4.17%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-2.30%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

Volatility

QLDY vs. IDVO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDYIDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.38%

16.40%

+4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.38%

16.48%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.38%

16.48%

+4.90%

QLDY vs. IDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than IDVO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLDY vs. IDVO - Dividend Comparison

QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.62%, more than IDVO's 5.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IDVO
Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.65%5.42%6.14%5.72%1.96%
QLDY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF
24.62%9.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLDY and IDVO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDVO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDVO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.

QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 24.62%, compared with 5.65% for IDVO.

QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.65% for IDVO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLDY and IDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer