PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLC vs. TLTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLC vs. TLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly higher than TLTD's 7.08% return. Over the past 10 years, QLC has outperformed TLTD with an annualized return of 15.29%, while TLTD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.42% annualized return.


QLC

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
9.54%
6M
7.97%
1Y
28.02%
3Y*
24.09%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
15.29%

TLTD

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
7.08%
6M
6.51%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLC vs. TLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
9.54%23.26%26.71%26.02%-17.21%28.46%13.64%24.51%-8.12%21.73%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
7.08%39.69%4.78%17.19%-13.74%12.84%4.21%21.26%-17.57%26.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and TLTD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.70

The correlation between QLC and TLTD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLC vs. TLTD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLC
TLTD

Technology

37.8%
7.8%

Financial Services

13.2%
24.4%

Communication Services

13.0%
3.5%

Healthcare

9.6%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
10.2%

Industrials

6.3%
19.0%

Utilities

3.1%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
5.4%

Real Estate

2.1%
3.3%

Basic Materials

2.0%
10.7%

Energy

2.0%
6.6%

Technology

QLC
37.8%
TLTD
7.8%

Financial Services

QLC
13.2%
TLTD
24.4%

Communication Services

QLC
13.0%
TLTD
3.5%

Healthcare

QLC
9.6%
TLTD
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QLC
7.8%
TLTD
10.2%

Industrials

QLC
6.3%
TLTD
19.0%

Utilities

QLC
3.1%
TLTD
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

QLC
3.0%
TLTD
5.4%

Real Estate

QLC
2.1%
TLTD
3.3%

Basic Materials

QLC
2.0%
TLTD
10.7%

Energy

QLC
2.0%
TLTD
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLC vs. TLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC
QLC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTD
TLTD Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
TLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. TLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLCTLTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.02

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.39

7.58

+6.81

QLC vs. TLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the TLTD Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and TLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLC vs. TLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, smaller than the maximum TLTD drawdown of -40.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and TLTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLCTLTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.86%

-40.62%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-12.11%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-13.10%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.81%

-28.96%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.86%

-40.62%

+4.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-3.59%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-7.66%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.23%

-1.28%

Volatility

QLC vs. TLTD - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) at 4.46%. This indicates that QLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLCTLTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.46%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

12.52%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

14.86%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

16.03%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.45%

16.58%

+1.87%

QLC vs. TLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLC vs. TLTD - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than TLTD's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
0.95%0.94%1.03%1.26%1.46%0.96%1.40%1.91%1.82%1.29%1.80%0.64%
TLTD
FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt
3.42%3.44%3.88%3.39%2.76%3.44%2.04%3.46%3.16%2.71%2.93%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLC and TLTD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLC has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to TLTD (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs TLTD's -40.62%.

On 10-year performance, QLC leads with 15.29% vs 10.42% for TLTD. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QLC has performed better with a 15.29% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for TLTD.

TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.95% for QLC.

QLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TLTD is Global Equities. QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.39% for TLTD.

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLC and TLTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer