PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QKACX vs. FNSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QKACX vs. FNSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QKACX vs. FNSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QKACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6
-4.88%21.16%31.05%23.55%-14.17%31.45%22.00%5.53%
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
5.18%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QKACX achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than FNSTX's 5.18% return.


QKACX

1D
3.04%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-4.88%
6M
-1.60%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
15.56%

FNSTX

1D
1.79%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
5.18%
6M
6.72%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
16.58%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QKACX vs. FNSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QKACX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FNSTX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QKACX vs. FNSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QKACX
QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QKACX vs. FNSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QKACXFNSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.69

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.20

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.31

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.54

11.29

-3.75

QKACX vs. FNSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QKACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FNSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QKACX and FNSTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QKACXFNSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.69

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.70

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.60

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between QKACX and FNSTX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QKACX vs. FNSTX - Dividend Comparison

QKACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than FNSTX's 3.95% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QKACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6
4.96%4.72%8.90%1.45%11.20%17.85%3.09%3.41%8.83%0.74%0.00%0.52%
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.95%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QKACX vs. FNSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QKACX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, which is greater than FNSTX's maximum drawdown of -35.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QKACX and FNSTX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QKACXFNSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.51%

-35.82%

-24.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-8.43%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-21.97%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-5.82%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.30%

-5.25%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.47%

-0.01%

Volatility

QKACX vs. FNSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) is 5.40%, while Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that QKACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QKACXFNSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

6.85%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

12.50%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

16.11%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

14.94%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

18.80%

-0.08%