PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNSTX vs. WMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FNSTX vs. WMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FNSTX vs. WMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
3.34%27.42%14.43%8.44%-7.59%7.58%12.80%5.49%
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
21.95%14.91%62.35%11.86%32.83%38.36%-8.20%5.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNSTX achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly lower than WMB's 21.95% return.


FNSTX

1D
-0.91%
1M
-6.77%
YTD
3.34%
6M
5.71%
1Y
24.93%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*

WMB

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
21.95%
6M
16.67%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
40.30%
5Y*
31.00%
10Y*
23.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNSTX vs. WMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNSTX
FNSTX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FNSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

WMB
WMB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
WMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
WMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNSTX vs. WMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) and The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNSTXWMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

1.05

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

1.44

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.18

+0.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.64

4.69

+5.95

FNSTX vs. WMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the WMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNSTX and WMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNSTXWMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.05

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.33

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.23

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between FNSTX and WMB is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FNSTX vs. WMB - Dividend Comparison

FNSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than WMB's 2.78% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSTX
Fidelity Infrastructure Fund
4.03%4.16%1.59%1.85%1.35%0.63%0.80%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
2.78%3.33%3.51%5.14%5.17%6.30%7.98%6.41%6.17%3.94%5.39%9.53%

Drawdowns

FNSTX vs. WMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNSTX drawdown since its inception was -35.82%, smaller than the maximum WMB drawdown of -98.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNSTX and WMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FNSTXWMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.82%

-98.03%

+62.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-12.36%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.97%

-23.01%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.47%

-3.88%

-3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-27.17%

+21.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

5.75%

-3.31%

Volatility

FNSTX vs. WMB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Infrastructure Fund (FNSTX) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) at 5.10%. This indicates that FNSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FNSTXWMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

5.10%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

16.36%

-3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

24.70%

-8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.92%

23.40%

-8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

31.62%

-12.83%