QJUN vs. TOLZ
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ).
QJUN and TOLZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QJUN is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Jun 18, 2021. TOLZ is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2014.
Performance
QJUN vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QJUN vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June | -1.87% | 13.59% | 16.36% | 36.34% | -17.34% | 7.08% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.27% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 6.18% | -4.25% | 3.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QJUN achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 11.27% return.
QJUN
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QJUN vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QJUN vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
QJUN
TOLZ
QJUN vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QJUN | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.05 | 1.94 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 2.14 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 10.58 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QJUN | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.42 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between QJUN and TOLZ is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QJUN vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
QJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TOLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.66% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Drawdowns
QJUN vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QJUN drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QJUN and TOLZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QJUN | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -39.33% | +19.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -8.82% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.03% | -3.16% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -6.70% | +2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.52% | 1.79% | -0.27% |
Volatility
QJUN vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) at 3.63%. This indicates that QJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QJUN | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 3.63% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.33% | 7.29% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 12.97% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 13.90% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 16.30% | -1.90% |