QISGX vs. SVAIX
QISGX (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund) and SVAIX (Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund) are both mutual funds - QISGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated, while SVAIX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, QISGX returned 13.62%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for SVAIX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QISGX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for SVAIX.
Performance
QISGX vs. SVAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QISGX achieves a 19.02% return, which is significantly higher than SVAIX's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, QISGX has outperformed SVAIX with an annualized return of 13.62%, while SVAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.
QISGX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 19.02%
- 6M
- 20.78%
- 1Y
- 46.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
SVAIX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 19.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
QISGX vs. SVAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | 19.02% | 17.72% | 15.63% | 19.63% | -27.94% | 18.14% | 29.91% | 21.14% | -6.33% | 25.17% |
SVAIX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 8.76% | 15.26% | 16.47% | -1.81% | 8.47% | 21.52% | -7.88% | 19.59% | -8.23% | 15.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between QISGX and SVAIX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QISGX and SVAIX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QISGX vs. SVAIX — Risk / Return Rank
QISGX
SVAIX
QISGX vs. SVAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund (SVAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QISGX | SVAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 5.20 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.27 | 14.39 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QISGX | SVAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 2.35 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.80 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.52 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
QISGX vs. SVAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QISGX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than SVAIX's maximum drawdown of -50.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QISGX and SVAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QISGX | SVAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -50.62% | -10.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.23% | -4.66% | -8.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.28% | -12.64% | -14.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.60% | -16.13% | -22.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.08% | -36.53% | -8.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -3.25% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.89% | -7.71% | -6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 2.59% | +0.94% |
Volatility
QISGX vs. SVAIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund (SVAIX) at 3.54%. This indicates that QISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QISGX | SVAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 3.54% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.86% | 7.32% | +8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 10.33% | +10.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 13.63% | +10.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 15.44% | +9.25% |
QISGX vs. SVAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QISGX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SVAIX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
QISGX vs. SVAIX - Dividend Comparison
QISGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than SVAIX's 6.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | 3.29% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 3.63% | 29.34% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 7.03% | 5.09% | 1.61% | 18.51% |
SVAIX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund | 6.05% | 6.41% | 7.58% | 4.32% | 9.68% | 3.72% | 4.28% | 8.75% | 8.54% | 10.36% | 5.24% | 8.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QISGX and SVAIX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QISGX has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to SVAIX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QISGX dropped -60.75% vs SVAIX's -50.62%.
SVAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QISGX and SVAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer