QIS vs. PCR
QIS (Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF) and PCR (Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QIS is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Simplify, while PCR is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Their 0.00 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QIS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PCR.
Performance
QIS vs. PCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIS achieves a -31.94% return, which is significantly lower than PCR's -12.93% return.
QIS
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- 6M
- -34.00%
- YTD
- -31.94%
- 1Y
- -48.32%
- 3Y*
- -24.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -24.05%
PCR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- -12.30%
- YTD
- -12.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $20.58K | $13.21K | $13.34K | |
| $8.01K | $6.87K | $26.74K |
QIS vs. PCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF | -31.94% | -22.30% |
PCR Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF | -12.93% | -5.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between QIS and PCR is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QIS vs. PCR — Risk / Return Rank
QIS
PCR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QIS vs. PCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF (PCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QIS | PCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.62 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QIS vs. PCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIS drawdown since its inception was -62.82%, which is greater than PCR's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIS and PCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIS | PCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.82% | -20.07% | -42.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.09% | -17.92% | -42.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -10.51% | -5.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.13% | — | — |
Volatility
QIS vs. PCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QIS | PCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.96% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.15% | 18.14% | +22.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.10% | 18.14% | +11.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.10% | 18.14% | +11.96% |
QIS vs. PCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PCR's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
QIS vs. PCR - Dividend Comparison
QIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than PCR's 10.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PCR Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF | 10.25% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF | 2.00% | 3.37% | 1.07% | 3.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QIS and PCR have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCR is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCR is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QIS.
PCR has the higher dividend yield at 10.25%, compared with 2.00% for QIS.
QIS is categorized as Multistrategy, while PCR is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QIS and 0.76% for PCR.
Find the right allocation for QIS and PCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer