QIG vs. VCLT
QIG (WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund) and VCLT (Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - QIG tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index while VCLT tracks the Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QIG returned 2.50%/yr vs 2.31%/yr for VCLT. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCLT.
Performance
QIG vs. VCLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIG achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than VCLT's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, QIG has outperformed VCLT with an annualized return of 2.50%, while VCLT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.31% annualized return.
QIG
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 5.92%
- 3Y*
- 5.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.56%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
VCLT
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 7.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.34%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.31%
QIG vs. VCLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 0.49% | 7.85% | 2.28% | 8.48% | -16.25% | -1.52% | 9.75% | 13.97% | -2.01% | 7.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.99% | 7.18% | -1.90% | 11.17% | -25.50% | -1.73% | 13.27% | 23.89% | -7.04% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QIG and VCLT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016 | 0.83 |
The correlation between QIG and VCLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.97 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QIG vs. VCLT — Risk / Return Rank
QIG
VCLT
QIG vs. VCLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.17 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 1.47 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 3.62 | +3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 0.97 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | -0.14 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.18 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.39 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
QIG vs. VCLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, smaller than the maximum VCLT drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIG and VCLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -34.31% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -5.25% | +2.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.22% | -13.03% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -34.31% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.92% | -34.31% | +11.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -14.36% | +13.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -8.16% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 2.13% | -1.27% |
Volatility
QIG vs. VCLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) is 1.35%, while Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that QIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QIG | VCLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 2.31% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.05% | 5.75% | -2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 7.92% | -3.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 12.78% | -5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 12.84% | -5.30% |
QIG vs. VCLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VCLT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QIG vs. VCLT - Dividend Comparison
QIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than VCLT's 5.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 4.88% | 4.82% | 4.67% | 4.19% | 4.25% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 2.88% | 2.35% | 0.00% |
VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.55% | 5.51% | 5.19% | 4.67% | 4.44% | 3.07% | 3.16% | 3.81% | 4.55% | 4.01% | 4.33% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, QIG and VCLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VCLT has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to QIG (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIG dropped -22.92% vs VCLT's -34.31%.
On 10-year performance, QIG leads with 2.50% vs 2.31% for VCLT. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, QIG has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QIG has performed better with a 2.50% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCLT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QIG.
VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 4.88% for QIG.
QIG tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index, while VCLT tracks Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QIG and 0.04% for VCLT.
QIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QIG and VCLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer