PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIG vs. OVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIG vs. OVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIG achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than OVT's 2.61% return.


QIG

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.66%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
5.29%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
2.50%

OVT

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.61%
6M
3.07%
1Y
8.92%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIG vs. OVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
0.49%7.85%2.28%8.48%-16.25%0.04%
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
2.61%7.61%7.44%7.73%-9.68%2.07%

Correlation

The correlation between QIG and OVT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021

0.62

The correlation between QIG and OVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIG vs. OVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIG
QIG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
QIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
QIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

OVT
OVT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
OVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
OVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIG vs. OVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIGOVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

2.60

-1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

3.83

-1.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

5.78

-3.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.91

20.00

-13.10

QIG vs. OVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the OVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIG and OVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIGOVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.60

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.65

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.69

-0.36

Drawdowns

QIG vs. OVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than OVT's maximum drawdown of -13.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIG and OVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIGOVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-13.59%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

-1.55%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.22%

-3.55%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

-13.59%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.41%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.51%

-3.39%

-2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.45%

+0.41%

Volatility

QIG vs. OVT - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF (OVT) at 0.83%. This indicates that QIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIGOVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.83%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.05%

2.52%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

3.44%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

4.63%

+2.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.54%

4.54%

+3.00%

QIG vs. OVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than OVT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIG vs. OVT - Dividend Comparison

QIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than OVT's 8.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
OVT
Overlay Shares Short Term Bond ETF
8.17%7.21%6.15%5.11%4.12%4.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QIG
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund
4.88%4.82%4.67%4.19%4.25%2.50%2.61%3.00%3.27%2.88%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIG and OVT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QIG has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to OVT (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIG dropped -22.92% vs OVT's -13.59%.

On 5-year performance, OVT leads with 3.01% vs 0.56% for QIG. On fees, QIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, OVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVT has performed better with a 3.01% return vs 0.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVT.

OVT has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 4.88% for QIG.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QIG and 0.80% for OVT.

OVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIG and OVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer