QIG vs. FLOT
QIG (WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund) and FLOT (iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QIG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index, while FLOT is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QIG returned 2.45%/yr vs 3.04%/yr for FLOT. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLOT.
Performance
QIG vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIG achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, QIG has underperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 2.45%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.04% annualized return.
QIG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.94%
- 1Y
- 5.10%
- 3Y*
- 5.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
FLOT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 2.15%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
QIG vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 0.75% | 7.85% | 2.28% | 8.48% | -16.25% | -1.52% | 9.75% | 13.97% | -2.01% | 7.00% |
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 2.01% | 4.91% | 6.53% | 6.43% | 1.28% | 0.45% | 0.87% | 3.97% | 1.48% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between QIG and FLOT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QIG vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank
QIG
FLOT
QIG vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QIG | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 3.11 | -1.89 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 11.03 | -9.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | 102.10 | -96.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QIG vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIG and FLOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIG | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -13.54% | -9.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | -0.43% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.22% | -1.57% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -2.36% | -20.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.92% | -13.54% | -9.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.02% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -0.21% | -5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.05% | +0.83% |
Volatility
QIG vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (QIG) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.21%. This indicates that QIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QIG | FLOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 0.21% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 0.63% | +2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 0.75% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.12% | 1.78% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 4.15% | +3.39% |
QIG vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QIG vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison
QIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than FLOT's 4.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF | 4.53% | 4.84% | 5.82% | 5.66% | 2.06% | 0.43% | 1.25% | 2.78% | 2.41% | 1.46% | 0.97% | 0.53% |
QIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 4.87% | 4.82% | 4.67% | 4.19% | 4.25% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 2.88% | 2.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QIG and FLOT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QIG has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIG dropped -22.92% vs FLOT's -13.54%.
On 10-year performance, FLOT leads with 3.04% vs 2.45% for QIG. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 3.04% return vs 2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QIG.
QIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 4.53% for FLOT.
QIG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. QIG tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Corporate Bond Index, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QIG and 0.15% for FLOT.
FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.36 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QIG and FLOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer