QIF.NEO vs. SLV
QIF.NEO (AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - QIF.NEO is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by AGF, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. QIF.NEO is actively managed, while SLV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QIF.NEO returned 12.26%/yr vs 21.68%/yr for SLV. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QIF.NEO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
QIF.NEO vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QIF.NEO is traded in CAD, while SLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIF.NEO achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -10.56% return.
QIF.NEO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -5.50%
- 1M
- -16.21%
- YTD
- -10.56%
- 6M
- -11.49%
- 1Y
- 74.24%
- 3Y*
- 42.87%
- 5Y*
- 21.68%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
QIF.NEO vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIF.NEO AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF | 15.29% | 14.80% | 21.37% | 4.72% | -2.67% | 20.54% | -8.96% | 20.89% | 5.27% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | -10.56% | 133.49% | 31.13% | -3.44% | 8.86% | -12.50% | 43.81% | 10.14% | 2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between QIF.NEO and SLV is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2018 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QIF.NEO vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
QIF.NEO
SLV
QIF.NEO vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF.NEO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QIF.NEO | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.26 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.27 | 1.66 | +3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 3.48 | +11.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QIF.NEO vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIF.NEO drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -64.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIF.NEO and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIF.NEO | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -64.48% | +33.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.67% | -45.02% | +40.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.29% | -45.02% | +34.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.54% | -45.02% | +29.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -45.02% | +45.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -34.64% | +30.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 21.43% | -19.74% |
Volatility
QIF.NEO vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF.NEO) is 3.05%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that QIF.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QIF.NEO | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 14.45% | -11.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 59.11% | -51.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.65% | 60.04% | -50.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.66% | 36.97% | -25.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 32.67% | -17.86% |
QIF.NEO vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIF.NEO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QIF.NEO vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
QIF.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIF.NEO AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF | 4.99% | 5.32% | 4.60% | 3.61% | 3.22% | 3.05% | 3.12% | 3.16% | 2.24% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QIF.NEO and SLV have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QIF.NEO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QIF.NEO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
QIF.NEO is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SLV is Silver. They also come from different issuers: AGF and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QIF.NEO and 0.50% for SLV.
Find the right allocation for QIF.NEO and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer