QIF.NEO vs. DXN.TO
QIF.NEO (AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF) and DXN.TO (Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QIF.NEO returned 11.27%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for DXN.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QIF.NEO vs. DXN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QIF.NEO having a 13.73% return and DXN.TO slightly higher at 13.74%.
QIF.NEO
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 13.73%
- 1Y
- 22.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 11.27%
- 10Y*
- —
DXN.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 19.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
QIF.NEO vs. DXN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIF.NEO AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.73% | 14.80% | 21.37% | 4.72% | -2.67% | 20.54% | -15.80% |
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 13.74% | 15.33% | 15.13% | -0.89% | -1.00% | 10.60% | -7.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between QIF.NEO and DXN.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QIF.NEO vs. DXN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QIF.NEO
DXN.TO
QIF.NEO vs. DXN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF.NEO) and Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QIF.NEO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.89 | 3.08 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.28 | 9.32 | +3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QIF.NEO vs. DXN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIF.NEO drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum DXN.TO drawdown of -34.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIF.NEO and DXN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIF.NEO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.71% | -34.85% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.67% | -6.50% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.29% | -14.79% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.54% | -18.55% | +3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -1.25% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -5.74% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.14% | -0.43% |
Volatility
QIF.NEO vs. DXN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF.NEO) is 2.29%, while Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF (DXN.TO) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that QIF.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QIF.NEO | DXN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 2.92% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.76% | 8.88% | -1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.72% | 11.16% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.66% | 12.85% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 16.67% | -1.89% |
Dividends
QIF.NEO vs. DXN.TO - Dividend Comparison
QIF.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than DXN.TO's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXN.TO Dynamic Active Global Infrastructure ETF | 1.98% | 2.10% | 3.26% | 2.30% | 1.21% | 0.91% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QIF.NEO AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF | 5.14% | 5.32% | 4.60% | 3.61% | 3.22% | 3.05% | 3.12% | 3.16% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QIF.NEO and DXN.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: AGF and Dynamic.
Find the right allocation for QIF.NEO and DXN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer