PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIACX vs. BEARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIACX vs. BEARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIACX achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly higher than BEARX's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, QIACX has outperformed BEARX with an annualized return of 16.89%, while BEARX has yielded a comparatively lower -14.61% annualized return.


QIACX

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.19%
YTD
6.94%
6M
8.29%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
15.65%
10Y*
16.89%

BEARX

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
-8.97%
6M
-9.06%
1Y
-18.52%
3Y*
-16.62%
5Y*
-12.25%
10Y*
-14.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIACX vs. BEARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
6.94%21.15%31.07%23.52%-14.16%31.40%21.95%26.91%-2.64%21.07%
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
-8.97%-12.42%-20.34%-18.67%17.78%-23.78%-22.95%-19.95%-5.96%-15.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QIACX and BEARX is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2003

-0.88

The correlation between QIACX and BEARX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIACX vs. BEARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIACX
QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BEARX
BEARX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BEARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEARX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BEARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEARX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIACX vs. BEARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIACXBEARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

0.71

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

-0.99

+3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

-1.86

+14.54

QIACX vs. BEARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the BEARX Sharpe Ratio of -1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIACX and BEARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIACXBEARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

-1.70

+3.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

-0.72

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

-0.88

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

-0.02

+0.59

Drawdowns

QIACX vs. BEARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIACX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, smaller than the maximum BEARX drawdown of -95.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIACX and BEARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIACXBEARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-95.75%

+35.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.65%

-19.52%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-44.46%

+25.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.05%

-52.48%

+29.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

-80.48%

+44.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-95.72%

+94.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.29%

-61.05%

+51.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

10.52%

-8.68%

Volatility

QIACX vs. BEARX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) and Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) have volatilities of 2.73% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIACXBEARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.87%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

8.77%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.01%

11.34%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

16.97%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

16.67%

+2.03%

QIACX vs. BEARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIACX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BEARX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIACX vs. BEARX - Dividend Comparison

QIACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, less than BEARX's 7.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
7.37%6.71%0.00%13.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QIACX
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund
4.28%4.58%8.65%1.40%10.90%17.44%3.01%3.34%8.60%0.69%1.12%1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIACX and BEARX have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEARX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to QIACX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIACX dropped -60.11% vs BEARX's -95.75%.

QIACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIACX and BEARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer