QHY vs. SCYB
QHY (WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - QHY tracks the WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index while SCYB tracks the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QHY returned 7.29% vs 6.99% for SCYB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QHY charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
QHY vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QHY achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.55% return.
QHY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QHY vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 1.46% | 9.61% | 5.92% | 6.57% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between QHY and SCYB is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between QHY and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QHY vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
QHY
SCYB
QHY vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QHY | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.87 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 12.87 | -0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QHY | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 1.88 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.68 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
QHY vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QHY and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QHY | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -4.92% | -17.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | -2.44% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.33% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -0.52% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.54% | +0.07% |
Volatility
QHY vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (QHY) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) have volatilities of 1.08% and 1.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QHY | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 1.07% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | 2.93% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 3.76% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 5.13% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 5.13% | +3.07% |
QHY vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
QHY vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
QHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than SCYB's 6.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QHY WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | 6.26% | 6.26% | 6.40% | 6.11% | 5.44% | 4.09% | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.93% | 6.47% | 4.39% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.94% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QHY and SCYB have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QHY has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to SCYB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QHY dropped -22.74% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
On 1-year performance, QHY leads with 7.29% vs 6.99% for SCYB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QHY has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for QHY.
SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 6.26% for QHY.
QHY tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QHY and 0.03% for SCYB.
QHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QHY and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer